Yemen: Ten maritime operations were carried out by the Armed Forces during the past week in support of the Palestinian people, in response to the US-UK aggression, according to the recent speech by the leader of the revolution, Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr al-Din al-Houthi.

It was clear that the Yemeni Armed Forces were establishing an "escalating" trend in their operations, not only in terms of the intensity of the strikes but also in terms of the quality of the targets. 

This includes both highly accurate strikes and those officially declared by the Armed Forces to be within the targeting range in the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. 

The leader of the revolution's statement about the execution of ten maritime operations against ships associated with the Zionist enemy and its sponsors during the past week revealed that the Yemeni naval movement has escalated and expanded significantly to the point that some operations are no longer announced for understandable reasons. 

The leader also emphasized that the Zionist enemy "must despair" of the return of its naval fleet or the arrival of supplies to it. This despair should also be shared by the Americans, whom the leader warned that the matter will not stop at their clear and declared failure to protect enemy ships or stop the Yemeni movement. It will lead to the development of military capabilities to become more accurate and destructive. This warning indicates the repetition of new surprises to come regarding manufacturing matters.

The five announced operations during the past week confirmed the content of the leader's statement. After targeting the British ship "Marlin Luanda," which remained burning "from night to night," according to the leader's expression, the armed forces launched a direct targeting path for American military units in the Red Sea. 

This started with the support ship "Lewis B. Puller," which is considered a mobile logistics base, and extended to the destroyer "USS Gravely." Although the American enemy did not admit its damage, American officials confirmed that it had to use its last layer of defense to confront the Yemeni missiles. 

The commander of the Fifth Fleet acknowledged a few days ago that these missiles are fast and that American ships have never faced them before. This means that the targeting of the destroyer clearly proved that it is not as fortified as the Americans think, and the likelihood of it being hit with significant damage has now become much higher than ever before.

On the same Wednesday in which the destroyer "Gravely" was targeted, the armed forces also announced the targeting of the American commercial ship "Cole" while it was sailing towards the ports of occupied Palestine in the Gulf of Aden. After 24 hours, a British commercial ship sailing to the same destination in the Red Sea was targeted.

These five operations confirmed that the Yemeni maritime movement is escalating not only in terms of the intensity of the strikes but also in terms of the range of targets. It is clear that there has been significant professional development and expansion in targeting capabilities to achieve the objectives of preventing navigation to the Zionist entity and responding to the American-British aggression simultaneously with each maritime strike. This advanced and exceptional level reveals a significant advancement in the capabilities of the armed forces in terms of armament, surveillance, execution, and adaptation.

These confirmations present the tripartite enemy system (the Zionist entity, the United States, and Britain) with the fact that the situation remains open to more shocking surprises.

This reality requires this system to measure it based on the facts of an operation in which the armed forces have proven in just one week that they can carry out intensive operations on two wide maritime fronts against all types of enemy naval assets, including advanced defensive and offensive destroyers. 

Therefore, persistence at the current level will result in a deadly military and economic hemorrhage for all parties of the enemy system. As for further escalation, it would be a maritime suicide that could lead to a historic and devastating geopolitical defeat for them. The Yemeni leadership has already demonstrated that it does not set any red lines in responding to escalation. If the response has reached this level now, the subsequent levels will be nothing less than "catastrophic" for the enemy.

According to the British newspaper "The Guardian," the industrial sector in the United Kingdom is already being affected as a result of the diversion of British ships (which were not targeted before the attack on Yemen). 

Additionally, the American network "CNN" confirmed days ago that trade officials and congressional advisers have confirmed that some companies have already started raising prices of goods due to the increased cost of shipping to the United States. 

This is similar to the beginning of the economic impact that hit the Israeli economy with the start of Yemeni maritime operations, which has now reached the point of boycotting many shipping companies to the occupied ports of Palestine, and the port of Eilat has almost completely stopped.

Based on the Zionist enemy's experience, the economic effects on the United States and Britain will undoubtedly escalate if the aggression and blockade on Gaza continue. This means that the Americans and the British will necessarily continue their attacks on Yemen, exposing their navigation to more risks. The American and British people will not tolerate this.

Even if the American and British governments rely on "controlling" the economic impact in some way, the military ramifications of continuing the genocidal war in Gaza will undermine this "control." The escalation of Yemeni maritime operations is likely to result in significant damage to American or British warships, putting the United States and Britain directly in the face of a historic defeat that will change many things.

Regardless of the extent of the Americans' and British' ability to "endure," the value of this endurance lies in reaching a satisfactory end. In the current naval battle, all endings are blocked for Washington and London. The path of forcing Sanaa to stop its operations is blocked, as evidenced by the clear failure of resorting to China for intervention. The path of attempting to destroy Yemeni capabilities is also blocked, as it carries the risks of escalating Yemeni retaliation. 

Similarly, all methods of protecting ships, which the armed forces have identified as legitimate targets, have clearly failed. The same applies to the international mobilization and attempts to open a global front against Yemen. 

Even if other countries join the aggression against Yemen, it will not affect the course of Yemeni action. Instead, it will add new naval assets to the target list. Therefore, talking about "controlling" the effects of the Yemeni operation, or more accurately, "enduring" these effects, is a fallacy that will quickly collapse if the genocidal war on Gaza continues. The only available option is to stop this criminal war against Palestine.