Middle East: The so-called "State of Israel" is the only and unique model among modern states whose establishment completely differs from that of all other nations.

This entity was planned by these powers to serve as an advanced base and spearhead in the Arab region, following their abandonment of traditional colonial methods based on direct military occupation and subjugation of people through force. 

The Western colonial powers, after bearing heavy costs, shifted to a new colonial method upon the establishment of the United Nations in 1945, based on military presence in the Arab region and subjugating its ruling regimes and peoples through soft power, under various formal agreements with functional regimes in the Arab region.

However, these colonial powers retained a model of their traditional colonial style in this region, embodied in their colonial base called the "State of Israel," using the international body (the United Nations) they created to grant false international legitimacy to their functional Zionist entity.

This served to mask their colonial project with a new method while concealing their old colonial approach, which the Zionist functional entity represented in the Arab region.

In this discussion, we will address the competition among Western colonial powers over the resources of Arab nations, the signs of which are beginning to surface. 

After more than a year following the "Al-Aqsa Storm" operation on October 7 of last year, and the subsequent declared stances of Western colonial powers condemning the operation and vowing to retaliate against its so-called terrorist perpetrators, as described by the rulers of these colonial powers. 

Those leaders flocked to the capital of their functional Zionist entity to express their positions (which they could have done from their own capitals without needing to be present in the capital of the occupation entity), it became clear that their presence was tied to the profound pain caused by the "Al-Aqsa Storm" operation. 

Leaders of these colonial powers, from presidents and prime ministers to foreign ministers and representatives of their political, economic, and military blocs, all declared their intent to seek revenge, under the false pretext of supporting "Israel's right to self-defense."

This pretext aimed to cover up the savagery, brutality, and degradation of these Western colonial powers. There was no significant difference between their stances on their commitment to "Israel's" security and its right to self-defense, or their pledge to supply their functional Zionist entity with all types of weapons and military equipment to ensure its superiority and victory over the so-called terrorists in Gaza, as described by those criminal colonial powers. 

They fulfilled their promises with extreme brutality, participating in the crime of genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza for more than a year, extending beyond Gaza geographically, with various levels of involvement in the crime.

The French President Exposes the Plan:

As a result, some differences began to surface among the colonial powers competing to divide interests and influence. These differences manifested in specific stances in Britain, France, and other Western colonial capitals, such as the ban on some arms licenses to the functional Zionist entity. 

The most recent stance came from French President Emmanuel Macron, who reminded Netanyahu that "Israel" was created by the United Nations. Macron was referring to UN General Assembly Resolution 181 of 1947, which partitioned Palestine into two parts: one for a Jewish state and the other for a Palestinian state. 

Macron's reminder to Netanyahu to abide by international resolutions highlights a French discontent rooted not in moral awakening but in the imbalance of interest-sharing, favoring the U.S.

Macron’s statement signals frustration with the growing dominance of the U.S. in the region's spoils, with little consideration for its European partners, and calls for a rebalancing of colonial interests.