News - Middle East: The Guardian newspaper criticized Manchester City, which is owned by the UAE, describing it as an example of sportswashing.

In an article, the newspaper indicated that Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Vice President of the UAE, to Manchester City is the main advisor to his older brother, President of the UAE, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, in his capacity as his deputy and deputy prime minister.

It stated that the UAE environment is highly politicized, Mansour has gained a reputation as a politician and business strategist, as Abu Dhabi has the third richest government fund in the world.

According to the newspaper, given Mansour's standing in Abu Dhabi, it is reasonable to ask whether he used his influence to reach treasured deals and promote the rise of Manchester City.

"City might be sanctioned for dishonesty, but fans have seen the club fall faster and harder through poor management and bad football," it said.

"City’s history shows there never was a golden age of ownership. Sanctions would be a judgment on the leadership team: let’s steer clear of the idea it’s a judgment on countries and their culture.”

In the same regard, Many critics see the Saudi-owned company, LIV Golf, as a deceptive scheme designed to make Americans view Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as part of a glamorous game of golf rather than the despot behind the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

Politico writer Michael Schaffer quotes U.S. Rep. Chip Roy as saying last year that “A foreign government’s dollars are being used to enhance that government’s brand and positioning here in the United States.” In other words, it’s a classic case of “sportswashing,” improving the look of a problematic regime by associating it with a peaceful, popular pastime.

But as LIV begins its sophomore season — and as the battle royale of political, legal and public relations scrums involving the upstart league also enter their second year — an unlikely counterargument is emerging: It’s hard to call something sportswashing if nearly every LIV news cycle seems to dirty up the kingdom’s reputation.
 
The latest set of unhappy headlines landed late last month, when a federal judge ruled that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund would have to answer questions and produce evidence as part of the discovery process in a legal battle between LIV and the rival PGA golf tour. The ruling could wind up pulling back the curtain on how decision-making works at the secretive state fund, whose governor holds ministerial rank in the MBS-dominated government.

“It is plain that PIF is not a mere investor in LIV,” Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen wrote, using the Saudi fund’s familiar abbreviation. “It is the moving force behind the founding, funding, oversight, and operation of LIV.”

A year ago, HRW wrote that Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund is attempting to “sportswash” the country’s egregious record of human rights violations through a new global golf tournament that begins later this month.

Human Rights Watch wrote to LIV Golf in August 2022, urging the league to develop a strategy to mitigate the risk of laundering the reputation of the Saudi government. There has been no answer or indication that LIV Golf sought to develop such a strategy.

The Crown Prince is rolling out ever more sporting events: sponsors should insist on human rights protections and disclosure and use LIV Golf events to demand human rights reforms.